Considering information access

\n

I'm realizing that this news is beyond my cutoff date, so I shouldn't fabricate details. It would be better to ask the user if they'd like a quick summary or background on the player, using known info up to 2024. Since I can't verify without browsing, I could check if they'd like me to look things up. Although I know browsing tools aren’t available in this interface, I still feel like I should weigh my options and act accordingly.Clarifying information requests

I think it's best to respond with some brief context and ask what the user specifically wants—like details, an official statement source, player profile, or analysis of impact. I should introduce Marcel Lotka and note that Dortmund's main goalkeeper is Gregor Kobel while Alexander Meyer is the backup. It seems [[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot;迈尔[[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot; likely refers to Meyer, so I can mention that his contract is extended to 2027. I'll give quick context about his age, role, and performance last season without citing exact stats unless I'm confident.Crafting concise response

\n

I can offer to pull an official announcement link from bvb.de if the user wants that. I'll aim for a concise response by acknowledging the news and providing 2-3 bullet points: who is involved, what happened, and why it matters. It’s also good to offer to fetch the source or provide more details, asking if they’d like a brief player profile. I think using simple bullets works best here, so I’ll include relevant context, like that BVB extended Alexander Meyer’s contract to 2027, without mentioning his age to avoid errors.

\n